In reviewing BP’s latest Statistic Review of World Energy, the big story for world oil last year was obvious: the USA’s third straight record-breaking increase in average annual production. Just over 75% of the net increase in world oil production during 2014 came from the USA; add in Canada and 90% of the total increase came from North America. Throw in Brazil’s first significant increase in three years and you have all the world’s net gain in world oil production accounted for by three non-OPEC players. Production from all other producers combined was flat. So the question for 2015 is straightforward: will we see a repeat of those gains…and the flat-liners?
A National Energy Program – A White Paper on Achieving Energy Independence and National Transformation. Continue Reading
By Steve Andrews and Tom Whipple – Editors, Peak Oil Review 1. Oil Price Crash Continue Reading
2014 ASPO-USA Update—Prepared by Richard Vodra. Introduction The story of America’s new energy abundance has Continue Reading
There has been considerable talk in the US of late about not only future energy Continue Reading
By David Hughes (Note: Commentaries do not necessarily represent ASPO-USA’s positions; they are personal statements and Continue Reading
Dr. Richard G. Miller, trained as a geologist, joined BP as a geochemist in 1985. Continue Reading
By Steve Andrews “False optimism leads to very poor investment decisions.” – Jeremy Grantham, Co-founder, Chief Investment Continue Reading
By Steve Andrews. Last week the U.S. Senate’s Energy Committee held the first hearing in Continue Reading
By Steve Andrews. Since the autumn of 2011, a storyline of “oil revolution” and Continue Reading
By Steve Andrews. (Commentaries do not necessarily represent the position of ASPO-USA) The key take-away Continue Reading
On October 19, 1973, the Organization of Arab Oil Exporting Countries (OAPEC) proclaimed an embargo Continue Reading
By Steve Andrews. Early last week, Shell Oil announced it was shutting down its oil Continue Reading
By Jan Lars Mueller. I learned last night that Al Bartlett–professor emeritus of physics at Continue Reading
ASPO-USA Co-founder Steve Andrews recently talked with Canadian geoscientist David Hughes on the outlook for Continue Reading
Below are excerpts from an interview with noted peak oil commentator Martin Payne by ASPO-USA Continue Reading
By Sally Odland, Steve Andrews, and John Theobald There are only two ways to live Continue Reading
By Steve Andrews and Randy Udall (Note: Commentaries do not necessarily represent the position of Continue Reading
(Note: Commentaries do not necessarily represent the position of ASPO-USA.) “New technology is almost as Continue Reading
(Note: Commentaries do not necessarily represent the position of ASPO-USA.) Saudi Arabia recently announced that Continue Reading
If one can’t rely on Daniel Yergin for soothing reassurances about the state of the global oil market, who you gonna call?
Daniel Yergin and his associates at Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA) have consistently predicted a 20% to 25% increase in global total liquids production (which consists of crude oil, condensate, natural gas liquids, refinery gains and other liquids such as low net energy biofuels).
Reasons for interest in electric power generation from wind are multifold. First, wind is a renewable energy source. It is not likely to deplete over time, which is not the case for oil, coal, and natural gas.
Second, wind electric power generators use no water, which is in declining supply in many places in the world.
The 2011 ASPO-USA Conference, held in Washington, DC November 2-5, in the shadow of the U.S. Capitol, attracted more than 300 participants from many walks of life. These attendees were brought together, presumably, by a belief that we are entering an era of inexorable decline in fossil fuel production and a desire to face head-on this very serious yet underreported predicament.
Last week we and other representatives of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil & Gas USA (ASPO-USA) stood on the steps of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to call for “Truth in Energy” concerning one of the most serious threats to our economy, national security, and environment: the prospect of an impending decline in world oil supply. The consequences of this milestone are far-reaching and potentially catastrophic. After a news conference at DOE, we delivered a letter to Energy Secretary Steven Chu summarizing our concerns and requesting answers to specific questions about DOE’s response to this monumental challenge.
By itself, the concept of having to get by on just a little bit less oil each year seems to be manageable enough. Some think that a steadily, or even sharply, rising price will merely reduce demand and promote exploration and that everything will more or less normally work itself out through well understood market mechanisms. Perhaps it will, but I think the odds are stacked against a smooth transition to a future of less net energy.